Michelle O’Bonsawin: Parliamentarians hear court’s best choice


OTTAWA-

New Supreme Court Justice Michelle O’Bonsawin appears before parliamentarians to discuss her nomination and her goals in the new role as the first Indigenous person chosen to serve on Canada’s highest court.

She will answer questions from members of the House of Commons Justice and Human Rights Committee, the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee, as well as a Green Party MP about her career, experiences and perspective. view of the law.

On August 19, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced O’Bonsawin’s appointment, and the appointment was quickly celebrated as fulfilling an important role at the highest level of the nation’s justice system.

Wednesday’s hearing is part of a process the Liberals instituted in 2016 to increase transparency in the appointment process for Supreme Court vacancies.

The search that ultimately led to O’Bonsawin’s nomination began in early April when Trudeau launched the screening process to identify candidates, giving potential candidates until May 13 to apply.

It was then the job of an independent advisory board to review the nominations and submit a shortlist for consideration by the Prime Minister. The board said it received 12 applications and ultimately interviewed six candidates. Trudeau received the shortlist in late June, months before naming O’Bonsawin as his Supreme Court pick.

The process is enacted whenever a vacancy looms. In this case, O’Bonsawin’s appointment is intended to fill the vacancy created by the upcoming Sept. 1 retirement of Supreme Court Justice Michael Moldaver after 11 years on the Supreme Court. A vote is not required to confirm his appointment.

CHANGES COULD INCREASE DIVERSITY: PRESIDENT

Ahead of O’Bonsawin’s hearing, members of the House of Commons Justice and Human Rights Committee heard from the chair of the Independent Advisory Council and former premier of Prince Edward Island , Wade MacLauchlan, and Minister of Justice, David Lametti, discuss the selection process and his appointment.

During their appearance before the committee on Wednesday morning, MacLauchlan said the selection of O’Bonsawin — a bilingual, bilingual Ontario judge becoming the first Indigenous person chosen to serve on Canada’s highest court — is proof that the independent process works. , but that there could be improvements. He suggested changes to the process that could ensure more diverse candidates continue to put forward their names.

“If this was an ongoing conversation – as opposed to something we rushed into just in the face of an impending departure from the Court and the need to recruit a new candidate – I think it could be something that could broaden the field of candidates,” MacLauchlan said, referring to comments from his predecessor in the role, former prime minister Kim Campbell. “I agree with these comments.”

He also said the process could benefit from more time for applicants to consider applying, and then for the board to assess the applications received.

“The process involves considerable study, discernment and the consideration of many details in the space of about six weeks or less… The work was done with diligence, collaboration, judgment and this helped the process. that being said, I think an extra one or two weeks for the delay would be beneficial for future Supreme Court appointments,” he said.

Since it might be some time before the next appointment, MacLauchlan suggested this might be an opportunity to make these changes and start educating potential future jurists well in advance.

“A lot of spreading information isn’t so much about giving notice as it is about setting in motion networks of encouragement. Lawyers and jurists, highly qualified to the point of being candidates for appointment to the Supreme Court of Canada, do not usually apply for a job. They may need an encouraging nudge from colleagues, they will need to talk about it at home to weigh family considerations, including what it means to relocate and move to Ottawa,” MacLauchlan said.

Lametti touted the process on Wednesday, saying O’Bonsawin’s appointment is an indication that it “is producing exceptional judicial appointments who bring to the Court not only unquestioned judicial excellence, but also a rich humanity and deep understanding. of Canada’s diversity”.

“I am confident that she will serve Canadians in an exceptional way, upholding the highest ideals of the Court and guiding the evolution of Canadian law,” Lametti told the committee.

APPOINTMENT WELCOMED BY MEPS

O’Bonsawin has been a judge of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Ottawa since 2017, and earlier this year she successfully defended her doctoral thesis on the application of the Gladue principles, which are ways for the courts consider the experiences of Indigenous peoples when making sentencing decisions.

The incoming judge was also described as having expertise in mental health, human rights and labor law, stemming from her experience working as general counsel for the Royal Ottawa, a mental health specialty hospital in Ottawa, with Royal Canadian Mounted Police legal services. Police and Canada Post lawyer.

An Abenaki member of the Odanak First Nation, Indigenous leaders touted her appointment as an inspiration that will see the Supreme Court enriched by having a judge on its bench who can interpret Canadian laws through an Indigenous lens.

As part of her candidacy, O’Bonsawin wrote about her experience as a First Nations lawyer and said that as a child in a working-class home, it was her “dream” to become lawyer.

At Wednesday’s hearing, Nunavut NDP MP Lori Idlout said O’Bonsawin’s nomination “opens up the possibility of establishing and recognizing a pluralistic legal system,” and called on the government federal government to ensure that this is not a one-off decision without further follow-up in terms of reconciliation in the justice system.

Other MPs expressed optimism that the decision marks another step, following last year’s appointment of Justice Mahmud Jamal, towards ensuring that the Supreme Court of Canada reflects the people of Canada.

Nova Scotia Liberal MP Jaime Battiste called it a “great day.”

“It’s a great day for many reasons. As a member of the Indigenous Bar Association for over 20 years as a student and then back as an Indigenous parliamentarian, I often heard the plea and the dream that one day we would see a candidate indigenous to the Supreme Court of Canada,” he said.

Responding to this remark, Lametti confirmed: “It is extremely important that indigenous peoples can see themselves in what are frankly colonial institutions, and see their participation as a means of improving these institutions, and see this as a means of improving Canadian law.